Advertisement

Recurrent Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy Management and the Risk of a Third Ectopic Pregnancy

  • Gilad Karavani
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author: Gilad Karavani, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah University Hospital, Ein Kerem, Kiryat Hadassah, POB 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center (Drs. Karavani, Gutman-Ido, Herzberg, Chill, and Dior, and Mr. Cohen)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Einat Gutman-Ido
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center (Drs. Karavani, Gutman-Ido, Herzberg, Chill, and Dior, and Mr. Cohen)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Shmuel Herzberg
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center (Drs. Karavani, Gutman-Ido, Herzberg, Chill, and Dior, and Mr. Cohen)

    IVF Unit, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein Kerem, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Medicine (Drs. Herzberg and Dior), Jerusalem, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Henry H. Chill
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center (Drs. Karavani, Gutman-Ido, Herzberg, Chill, and Dior, and Mr. Cohen)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Adiel Cohen
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center (Drs. Karavani, Gutman-Ido, Herzberg, Chill, and Dior, and Mr. Cohen)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Uri P. Dior
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center (Drs. Karavani, Gutman-Ido, Herzberg, Chill, and Dior, and Mr. Cohen)

    IVF Unit, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein Kerem, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Medicine (Drs. Herzberg and Dior), Jerusalem, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
Published:December 10, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.005

      ABSTRACT

      Study Objective

      To evaluate the rate of a third ectopic pregnancy according to the modality of treatment of the second ectopic pregnancy.

      Design

      Retrospective cohort study.

      Setting

      University-affiliated tertiary medical center.

      Patients

      One hundred eleven women who had 2 ectopic pregnancies and a third consecutive pregnancy between 2003 and 2018.

      Interventions

      Surgery or medical treatment as required.

      Measurements and Main Results

      With regard to the modality of treatment of the second ectopic pregnancy, the patients were divided into 3 groups: expectant management, medical treatment with methotrexate, and laparoscopic salpingectomy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the association of various parameters of the second ectopic pregnancy with the occurrence of a third ectopic pregnancy in the consecutive pregnancy. Twenty women (18.0%) were managed expectantly, 55 (49.6%) were treated with methotrexate, and 36 (32.4%) underwent surgery. Expectant management resulted in significantly higher rates of a third ectopic pregnancy compared with treatment with methotrexate or surgical intervention (50.0% vs 18.2% and 13.8%, respectively; p = .005). In the cases of 2 ipsilateral ectopic pregnancies, the interventional approach (medical or surgical treatment) resulted in lower recurrence rates compared with expectant management (25.7% vs 60.0%, respectively; p = .043).

      Conclusion

      The risk of a third episode of an ectopic pregnancy after expectant management of a second ectopic pregnancy is extremely high. An interventional approach by treatment with methotrexate or salpingectomy is therefore preferred for recurrent ectopic pregnancy management, especially in ipsilateral recurrences.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      AAGL Member Login
      AAGL Member, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Use your society credentials to access all journal content and features.
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Purchase one-time access:

      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Ectopic pregnancy–United States, 1990-1992.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1995; 44: 46-48
        • Coste J
        • Bouyer J
        • Job-Spira N
        Epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy: incidence and risk factors [article in French].
        Contracept Fertil Sex. 1996; 24: 135-139
        • Egger M
        • Low N
        • Smith GD
        • Lindblom B
        • Herrmann B.
        Screening for chlamydial infections and the risk of ectopic pregnancy in a county in Sweden: ecological analysis.
        BMJ. 1998; 316: 1776-1780
        • Saraiya M
        • Berg CJ
        • Shulman H
        • Green CA
        • Atrash HK.
        Estimates of the annual number of clinically recognized pregnancies in the United States, 1981–1991.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1999; 149: 1025-1029
        • Bernoux A
        • Job-Spira N
        • Germain E
        • Coste J
        • Bouyer J
        Fertility outcome after ectopic pregnancy and use of an intrauterine device at the time of the index ectopic pregnancy.
        Hum Reprod. 2000; 15: 1173-1177
        • Farquhar CM.
        Ectopic pregnancy.
        Lancet. 2005; 366: 583-591
        • Butts S
        • Sammel M
        • Hummel A
        • Chittams J
        • Barnhart K.
        Risk factors and clinical features of recurrent ectopic pregnancy: a case control study.
        Fertil Steril. 2003; 80: 1340-1344
        • Barnhart KT
        • Sammel MD
        • Gracia CR
        • Chittams J
        • Hummel AC
        • Shaunik A.
        Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in women with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancies.
        Fertil Steril. 2006; 86: 36-43
        • Ellaithy M
        • Asiri M
        • Rateb A
        • Altraigey A
        • Abdallah K.
        Prediction of recurrent ectopic pregnancy: a five-year follow-up cohort study.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018; 225: 70-78
        • Barnhart KT.
        Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 379-387
        • Bouyer J
        • Coste J
        • Shojaei T
        • et al.
        Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 157: 185-194
        • Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology
        ACOG practice bulletin no. 191: tubal ectopic pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131: e65-e77
        • DeCherney AH
        • Silidker JS
        • Mezer HC
        • Tarlatzis BC.
        Reproductive outcome following two ectopic pregnancies.
        Fertil Steril. 1985; 43: 82-85
        • Tulandi T.
        Reproductive performance of women after two tubal ectopic pregnancies.
        Fertil Steril. 1988; 50: 164-166
        • de Bennetot M
        • Rabischong B
        • Aublet-Cuvelier B
        • et al.
        Fertility after tubal ectopic pregnancy: results of a population-based study.
        Fertil Steril. 2012; 98 (e1–e3): 1271-1276
        • Horne AW
        • Critchley HO.
        Mechanisms of disease: the endocrinology of ectopic pregnancy.
        Expert Rev Mol Med. 2012; 14: e7
        • Shaw JL
        • Dey SK
        • Critchley HO
        • Horne AW.
        Current knowledge of the aetiology of human tubal ectopic pregnancy.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2010; 16: 432-444
        • Horne AW
        • King AE
        • Shaw E
        • et al.
        Attenuated sex steroid receptor expression in fallopian tube of women with ectopic pregnancy [published correction appears in J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:4992].
        J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 94: 5146-5154
        • Levin G
        • Dior UP
        • Shushan A
        • Gilad R
        • Benshushan A
        • Rottenstreich A.
        Success rate of methotrexate treatment for recurrent vs. primary ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study.
        J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020; 40: 507-511
        • van Mello NM
        • Mol F
        • Verhoeve HR
        • et al.
        Methotrexate or expectant management in women with an ectopic pregnancy or pregnancy of unknown location and low serum hCG concentrations? A randomized comparison.
        Hum Reprod. 2013; 28: 60-67
        • Mavrelos D
        • Nicks H
        • Jamil A
        • Hoo W
        • Jauniaux E
        • Jurkovic D.
        Efficacy and safety of a clinical protocol for expectant management of selected women diagnosed with a tubal ectopic pregnancy.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 42: 102-107
        • Yousefnezhad A
        • Pirdehghan A
        • Roshandel Rad M
        • Eskandari A
        • Ahmadi S
        Comparison of the pregnancy outcomes between the medical and surgical treatments in tubal ectopi pregnancy.
        Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018; 16: 31-34