Advertisement

Office Operative Hysteroscopy: An Update

Published:August 10, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.009

      Abstract

      Hysteroscopy is considered the gold standard for the evaluation of intracavitary pathology in both premenopausal and postmenopausal patients associated with abnormal uterine bleeding, as well as for the evaluation of infertile patients with suspected cavity abnormalities. Office-based operative hysteroscopy allows patients to resume activities immediately and successfully integrates clinical practice into a “see and treat” modality, avoiding the added risks of anesthesia and the inconvenience of the operating room. For 2017, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has provided a substantial increase in reimbursement for a select number of office-based hysteroscopic procedures. This review provides an update on the indications, equipment, and procedures for office hysteroscopy, as well as the management of complications that may arise within an office-based practice.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      AAGL Member Login
      AAGL Member, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Use your society credentials to access all journal content and features.
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gkrozou F.
        • Dimakopoulos G.
        • Vrekoussis T.
        • et al.
        Hysteroscopy in women with abnormal uterine bleeding: a meta-analysis on four major endometrial pathologies.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015; 291: 1347-1354
        • van Dongen H.
        • de Kroon C.D.
        • Jacobi C.E.
        • Trimbos J.B.
        • Jansen F.W.
        Diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007; 114: 664-675
        • Bosteels J.
        • Kasius J.
        • Weyers S.
        • Broekmans F.J.
        • Mol B.W.
        • D'Hooghe T.M.
        Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (CD009461)
        • Isaacson K.
        Office hysteroscopy: a valuable but under-utilized technique.
        Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 14: 381-385
        • Moawad N.S.
        • Santamaria E.
        • Johnson M.
        • Shuster J.
        Cost-effectiveness of office hysteroscopy for abnormal uterine bleeding.
        JSLS. 2014; 18https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00393
        • Keyhan S.
        • Munro M.G.
        Office diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy using local anesthesia only: an analysis of patient reported pain and other procedural outcomes.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 21: 791-798
        • Kremer C.
        • Duffy S.
        • Moroney M.
        Patient satisfaction with outpatient hysteroscopy versus day case hysteroscopy: randomised controlled trial.
        BMJ. 2000; 320: 279-282
        • Di Spiezio Sardo A.
        • Bettocchi S.
        • Spinelli M.
        • et al.
        Review of new office-based hysteroscopic procedures 2003-2009.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17: 436-448
        • Kjerulff K.H.
        • Erickson B.A.
        • Langenberg P.W.
        Chronic gynecological conditions reported by US women: findings from the National Health Interview Survey, 1984 to 1992.
        Am J Public Health. 1996; 86: 195-199
        • Matteson K.A.
        • Raker C.A.
        • Clark M.A.
        • Frick K.D.
        Abnormal uterine bleeding, health status, and usual source of medical care: analyses using the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey.
        J Womens Health. 2013; 22: 959-965
        • Munro M.G.
        • Critchley H.O.
        • Broder M.S.
        • Fraser I.S.
        • FIGO Working Group on Menstrual Disorders
        FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011; 113: 3-13
        • Zimmermann A.
        • Bernuit D.
        • Gerlinger C.
        • Schaefers M.
        • Geppert K.
        Prevalence, symptoms and management of uterine fibroids: an international internet-based survey of 21,746 women.
        BMC Womens Health. 2012; 12: 6
        • Grimbizis G.F.
        • Tsolakidis D.
        • Mikos T.
        • et al.
        A prospective comparison of transvaginal ultrasound, saline infusion sonohysterography, and diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of endometrial pathology.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 2720-2725
        • Clark T.J.
        • Barton P.M.
        • Coomarasamy A.
        • Gupta J.K.
        • Khan K.S.
        Investigating postmenopausal bleeding for endometrial cancer: cost-effectiveness of initial diagnostic strategies.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006; 113: 502-510
        • van Hanegem N.
        • Prins M.M.
        • Bongers M.Y.
        • et al.
        The accuracy of endometrial sampling in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 197: 147-155
        • Clark T.J.
        • Mann C.H.
        • Shah N.
        • Khan K.S.
        • Song F.
        • Gupta J.K.
        Accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer: a systematic quantitative review.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 109: 313-321
        • Ben-Arie A.
        • Tamir S.
        • Dubnik S.
        • et al.
        Does hysteroscopy affect prognosis in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer?.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008; 18: 813-819
        • Bourdel N.
        • Chauvet P.
        • Tognazza E.
        • Pereira B.
        • Botchorishvili R.
        • Canis M.
        Sampling in atypical endometrial hyperplasia: which method results in the lowest underestimation of endometrial cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23: 692-701
        • Di Spiezio Sardo A.
        • Di Carlo C.
        • Minozzi S.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of hysteroscopy in improving reproductive outcomes of infertile couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2016; 22: 479-496
        • Tasma M.L.
        • Louwerse M.D.
        • Hehenkamp W.J.
        • et al.
        Misoprostol for cervical priming prior to hysteroscopy in postmenopausal and premenopausal nulliparous women; a multicentre randomised placebo controlled trial.
        BJOG. 2018; 125: 81-89
        • Fouda U.M.
        • Gad Allah S.H.
        • Elshaer H.S.
        Optimal timing of misoprostol administration in nulliparous women undergoing office hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.
        Fertil Steril. 2016; 106: 196-201
        • Zhuo Z.
        • Yu H.
        • Jiang X.
        A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of cervical ripening with misoprostol administration before hysteroscopy.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016; 132: 272-277
        • Oppegaard K.S.
        • Lieng M.
        • Berg A.
        • Istre O.
        • Qvigstad E.
        • Nesheim B.I.
        A combination of misoprostol and estradiol for preoperative cervical ripening in postmenopausal women: a randomised controlled trial.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 117: 53-61
        • Cooper N.A.
        • Smith P.
        • Khan K.S.
        • Clark T.J.
        Vaginoscopic approach to outpatient hysteroscopy: a systematic review of the effect on pain.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 117: 532-539
        • Suen M.W.H.
        • Bougie O.
        • Singh S.S.
        Hysteroscopic management of a stenotic cervix.
        Fertil Steril. 2017; 107: e19
        • Bettocchi S.
        • Bramante S.
        • Bifulco G.
        • et al.
        Challenging the cervix: strategies to overcome the anatomic impediments to hysteroscopy: analysis of 31,052 office hysteroscopies.
        Fertil Steril. 2016; 105: e16-e17
        • Bradley L.D.
        • Widrich T.
        State-of-the-art flexible hysteroscopy for office gynecologic evaluation.
        J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1995; 2: 263-267
        • Ahmad G.
        • Attarbashi S.
        • O'Flynn H.
        • Watson A.J.
        Pain relief in office gynaecology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 155: 3-13
        • Allen R.H.
        • Micks E.
        • Edelman A.
        Pain relief for obstetric and gynecologic ambulatory procedures.
        Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2013; 40: 625-645
        • Soriano D.
        • Ajaj S.
        • Chuong T.
        • Deval B.
        • Fauconnier A.
        • Daraï E.
        Lidocaine spray and outpatient hysteroscopy: randomized placebo-controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96: 661-664
        • Wong A.Y.
        • Wong K.
        • Tang L.C.
        Stepwise pain score analysis of the effect of local lignocaine on outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
        Fertil Steril. 2000; 73: 1234-1237
        • Dealberti D.
        • Riboni F.
        • Cosma S.
        • et al.
        Feasibility and acceptability of office-based polypectomy with a 16F mini-resectoscope: a multicenter clinical study.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23: 418-424
        • Noventa M.
        • Ancona E.
        • Quaranta M.
        • et al.
        Intrauterine morcellator devices: the icon of hysteroscopic future or merely a marketing image? A systematic review regarding safety, efficacy, advantages, and contraindications.
        Reprod Sci. 2015; 22: 1289-1296
        • Clark T.J.
        • Stevenson H.
        Endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB-P): what is the relationship, how are they diagnosed and how are they treated?.
        Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017; 40: 89-104
        • Golan A.
        • Cohen-Sahar B.
        • Keidar R.
        • Condrea A.
        • Ginath S.
        • Sagiv R.
        Endometrial polyps: symptomatology, menopausal status and malignancy.
        Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010; 70: 107-112
        • Costa-Paiva L.
        • Godoy Jr, C.E.
        • Antunes Jr, A.
        • Caseiro J.D.
        • Arthuso M.
        • Pinto-Neto A.M.
        Risk of malignancy in endometrial polyps in premenopausal and postmenopausal women according to clinicopathologic characteristics.
        Menopause. 2011; 18: 1278-1282
        • Varras M.
        • Polyzos D.
        • Akrivis C.
        Effects of tamoxifen on the human female genital tract: review of the literature.
        Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003; 24: 258-268
      1. Committee Opinion No. 601: tamoxifen and uterine cancer.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 1394-1397
        • Donaghay M.
        • Lessey B.A.
        Uterine receptivity: alterations associated with benign gynecological disease.
        Semin Reprod Med. 2007; 25: 461-475
        • Pérez-Medina T.
        • Bajo-Arenas J.
        • Salazar F.
        • et al.
        Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study.
        Hum Reprod. 2005; 20: 1632-1635
        • Shokeir T.A.
        • Shalan H.M.
        • El-Shafei M.M.
        Significance of endometrial polyps detected hysteroscopically in eumenorrheic infertile women.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004; 30: 84-89
        • Cooper N.A.M.
        • Clark T.J.
        • Middleton L.
        • et al.
        Outpatient versus inpatient uterine polyp treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding: randomised controlled non-inferiority study.
        BMJ. 2015; 350: h1398
        • Diwakar L.
        • Roberts T.E.
        • Cooper N.A.
        • et al.
        An economic evaluation of outpatient versus inpatient polyp treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016; 123: 625-631
        • Franchini M.
        • Zolfanelli F.
        • Gallorini M.
        • Giarrè G.
        • Fimiani R.
        • Florio P.
        Hysteroscopic polypectomy in an office setting: specimen quality assessment for histopathological evaluation.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015; 189: 64-67
        • Di Spiezio Sardo A.
        • Calagna G.
        • Guida M.
        • Perino A.
        • Nappi C.
        Hysteroscopy and treatment of uterine polyps.
        Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015; 29: 908-919
        • American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
        AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of endometrial polyps.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012; 19: 3-10
        • Hanstede M.M.
        • van der Meij E.
        • Goedemans L.
        • Emanuel M.H.
        Results of centralized Asherman surgery, 2003-2013.
        Fertil Steril. 2015; 104 (e1): 1561-1568
        • Gilman A.R.
        • Dewar K.M.
        • Rhone S.A.
        • Fluker M.R.
        Intrauterine adhesions following miscarriage: look and learn.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016; 38: 453-457
        • Seshadri S.
        • El-Toukhy T.
        • Douiri A.
        • Jayaprakasan K.
        • Khalaf Y.
        Diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonography in the evaluation of uterine cavity abnormalities prior to assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review and meta-analyses.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2015; 21: 262-274
        • AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide
        AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for management of intrauterine synechiae.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17: 1-7
        • Bougie O.
        • Lortie K.
        • Shenassa H.
        • Chen I.
        • Singh S.S.
        Treatment of Asherman's syndrome in an outpatient hysteroscopy setting.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22: 446-450
        • Chen L.
        • Zhang H.
        • Wang Q.
        • et al.
        Reproductive outcomes in patients with intrauterine adhesions following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: experience from the largest women's hospital in China.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017; 24: 299-304
        • Di Spiezio Sardo A.
        • Calagna G.
        • Scognamiglio M.
        • O'Donovan P.
        • Campo R.
        • De Wilde R.L.
        Prevention of intrauterine post-surgical adhesions in hysteroscopy. A systematic review.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 203: 182-192
        • March C.M.
        Management of Asherman's syndrome.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2011; 23: 63-76
        • Johary J.
        • Xue M.
        • Zhu X.
        • Xu D.
        • Velu P.P.
        Efficacy of estrogen therapy in patients with intrauterine adhesions: systematic review.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 21: 44-54
        • Robinson J.K.
        • Colimon L.M.
        • Isaacson K.B.
        Postoperative adhesiolysis therapy for intrauterine adhesions (Asherman's syndrome).
        Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: 409-414
        • Chan Y.Y.
        • Jayaprakasan K.
        • Zamora J.
        • Thornton J.G.
        • Raine-Fenning N.
        • Coomarasamy A.
        The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17: 761-771
        • Venetis C.A.
        • Papadopoulos S.P.
        • Campo R.
        • Gordts S.
        • Tarlatzis B.C.
        • Grimbizis G.F.
        Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 29: 665-683
        • Moini A.
        • Mohammadi S.
        • Hosseini R.
        • Eslami B.
        • Ahmadi F.
        Accuracy of 3-dimensional sonography for diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2013; 32: 923-927
        • Andreotti R.F.
        • Fleischer A.C.
        Practical applications of 3D sonography in gynecologic imaging.
        Radiol Clin North Am. 2014; 52: 1201-1213
        • Grimbizis G.F.
        • Di Spiezio Sardo A.
        • Saravelos S.H.
        • et al.
        The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies.
        Gynecol Surg. 2016; 13: 1-16
        • Smit J.G.
        • Kasius J.C.
        • Eijkemans M.J.
        • et al.
        The international agreement study on the diagnosis of the septate uterus at office hysteroscopy in infertile patients.
        Fertil Steril. 2013; 99 (e2): 2108-2113
        • Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
        • Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
        Uterine septum: a guideline.
        Fertil Steril. 2016; 106: 530-540
        • Nouri K.
        • Ott J.
        • Huber J.C.
        • Fischer E.M.
        • Stögbauer L.
        • Tempfer C.B.
        Reproductive outcome after hysteroscopic septoplasty in patients with septate uterus–a retrospective cohort study and systematic review of the literature.
        Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010; 8: 52
        • Bakas P.
        • Gregoriou O.
        • Hassiakos D.
        • Liapis A.
        • Creatsas M.
        • Konidaris S.
        Hysteroscopic resection of uterine septum and reproductive outcome in women with unexplained infertility.
        Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012; 73: 321-325
        • Cararach M.
        • Penella J.
        • Ubeda A.
        • Labastida R.
        Hysteroscopic incision of the septate uterus: scissors versus resectoscope.
        Hum Reprod. 1994; 9: 87-89
        • Vilos G.A.
        • Edris F.
        • Abu-Rafea B.
        • Hollett-Caines J.
        • Ettler H.C.
        • Al-Mubarak A.
        Miscellaneous uterine malignant neoplasms detected during hysteroscopic surgery.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009; 16: 318-325
        • Wortman M.
        • Daggett A.
        • Ball C.
        Operative hysteroscopy in an office-based surgical setting: review of patient safety and satisfaction in 414 cases.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013; 20: 56-63
        • Wortman M.
        Instituting an office-based surgery program in the gynecologist's office.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17: 673-683