The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 17, Issue 5 , Pages 551-554 , September 2010

Risk Factors for Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy

  • William H. Parker, MD

      Affiliations

    • John Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: William H. Parker, MD, John Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint John's Health Center, 1450 10th St, Ste 404, Santa Monica, CA 90401-2831.
  • ,
  • Jon Einarsson, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Olav Istre, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Jean-Bernard Dubuisson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland

Received 11 March 2010 ,Accepted 30 April 2010.

References 

  1. Jin C, Hu Y, Chen X, et al. Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;145:14–22
  2. Garnet JD. Uterine rupture during pregnancy: an analysis of 133 patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1964;23:898–905
  3. Palerme GR, Friedman EA. Rupture of the gravid uterus in the third trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966;94:571–576
  4. Malzoni M, Sizzi O, Rossetti A, Imperato F. Laparoscopic myomectomy: a report of 982 procedures. Surg Technol Int. 2006;15:123–129
  5. Mecke H, Wallas F, Bröcker A, Gertz H. Pelviscopic myoma enucleation: technique, limits, complications. [in German] Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1995;55:374–379
  6. Harris W. Uterine dehiscence following laparoscopic myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:545–546
  7. Dubuisson JB, Chavet X, Chapron C, Gregorakis SS, Morice P. Uterine rupture during pregnancy after laparoscopic myomectomy. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1475–1477
  8. Friedmann W, Maier R, Luttkus A, Schäfer A, Dudenhausen J. Uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75:683–684
  9. Hockstein S. Spontaneous uterine rupture in the early third trimester after laparoscopically assisted myomectomy: a case report. J Reprod Med. 2000;45:139–141
  10. Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA. Spontaneous uterine rupture at thirty-three weeks subsequent to previous superficial laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1547–1549
  11. Parker W, Iacampo K, Long T. Uterine rupture after laparoscopic removal of a pedunculated myoma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:362–364
  12. Oktem O, Gökaslan H, Durmusoglu F. Spontaneous uterine rupture in pregnancy 8 years after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8:618–621
  13. Jakiel G, Sobstyl M, Swatowski D. Spontaneous uterine rupture during delivery in a patient who had previously undergone laparoscopic myomectomy. Gynaecol Endosc. 2002;11:315–317
  14. Hasbargen U, Summerer-Moustaki M, Hillemanns P, Scheidler J, Kimmig R, Hepp H. Uterine dehiscence in a nullipara, diagnosed by MRI, following use of unipolar electrocautery during laparoscopic myomectomy: case report. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2180–2182
  15. Malberti S, Ferrari L, Milani R. Spontaneous uterine rupture in the third trimester of gestation after laparoscopic myomectomy: a case report. [in Italian] Minerva Ginecol. 2004;56:479–480
  16. Lieng M, Istre O, Langebrekke A. Uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11:92–93
  17. Kelly B, Bright P, Mackenzie I. Does the surgical approach used for myomectomy influence the morbidity in subsequent pregnancy?. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;28:77–81
  18. Banas T, Klimek M, Fugiel A, Skotniczny K. Spontaneous uterine rupture at 35 weeks' gestation, 3 years after laparoscopic myomectomy, without signs of fetal distress. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005;31:527–530
  19. Grande N, Catalano G, Ferrari S, Marana R. Spontaneous uterine rupture at 27 weeks of pregnancy after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:301
  20. Koh C, Janik G. Laparoscopic myomectomy: the current status. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15:295–301
  21. Rosch R, Junge K, Binnebösel M, Mirgartz N, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Gas-related impact of pneumoperitoneum on systemic wound healing. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008;393:75–80
  22. Berkeley C, Bonney V. A Textbook of Gynaecological Surgery. New York, NY: Funk and Wagnalls; 1911;418–420
  23. Guarnaccia MM, Rein MS. Traditional surgical approaches to uterine fibroids: abdominal myomectomy and hysterectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;44:385–400
  24. West S, Ruiz R, Parker W. Abdominal myomectomy in women with very large uterine size. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:36–39
  25. Cobellis L, Pecori E, Cobellis G. Comparison of intramural myomectomy scar after laparotomy or laparoscopy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;84:87–88
  26. Pollio F, Staibano S, Mascolo M, et al. Uterine dehiscence in term pregnant patients with one previous cesarean delivery: growth factor immunoexpression and collagen content in the scarred lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:527–534
  27. Werner S, Grose R. Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol Rev. 2003;83:835–870
  28. Morosolli A, Veeck E, Niccoli-Filho W, Gomes M, das Graças V, Goulart M. Healing process after surgical treatment with scalpel, electrocautery and laser radiation: histomorphologic and histomorphometric analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2010;25:93–100
  29. Takamoto N, Leppert PC, Yu SY. Cell death and proliferation and its relation to collagen degradation in uterine involution of rat. Connect Tissue Res. 1998;37:163–175
  30. Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Philippe H, Nisand I. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet. 1996;347:281–284
  31. Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E, et al. Deficient lower-segment cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:72–77
  32. Bick D. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health; National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Caesarean section. Clinical Guideline. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Commissioned by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1:198–199
  33. Bujold E, Bujold C, Hamilton EF, Harel F, Gauthier RJ. The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1326–1330
  34. Tepper R, Beyth Y, Klein Z, Aviram R. Postmyomectomy sonographic imaging: uterus remodeling and scar repair. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280:509–511
  35. Tsuji S, Takahashi K, Imaoka I, Sugimura K, Miyazaki K, Noda Y. MRI dvaluation of the uterine structure after myomectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2006;61:106–110
  36. Darwish AM, Nasr AM, El-Nashar DA. Evaluation of postmyomectomy uterine scar. J Clin Ultrasound. 2005;33:181–186
  37. Keckstein J, Karageorgieva E, Darwish A, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy sonographic follow-up and second-look laparoscopy for the evaluation of a new technique. J Amer Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994;4(pt 2):S16

 The authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

PII: S1553-4650(10)00236-0

doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.04.015

The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 17, Issue 5 , Pages 551-554 , September 2010