The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 17, Issue 5 , Pages 576-582, September 2010

Laparoscopy and Body Mass Index: Feasibility and Outcome in Obese Patients Treated for Gynecologic Diseases

  • Marco Camanni, MD

      Affiliations

    • GINTEAM, Unit of Minimally Invasive Gynaecology, Turin, Italy
  • ,
  • Luca Bonino, MD

      Affiliations

    • GINTEAM, Unit of Minimally Invasive Gynaecology, Turin, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Luca Bonino, MD, GINTEAM Unit of Minimally Invasive Gynaecology, Corso Marconi 35, 10125 Turin, Italy.
  • ,
  • Elena Maria Delpiano, MD

      Affiliations

    • GINTEAM, Unit of Minimally Invasive Gynaecology, Turin, Italy
  • ,
  • Giuseppe Migliaretti, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health and Microbiology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  • ,
  • Paola Berchialla, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health and Microbiology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  • ,
  • Francesco Deltetto, MD

      Affiliations

    • GINTEAM, Unit of Minimally Invasive Gynaecology, Turin, Italy

Received 14 January 2010; accepted 19 March 2010. published online 09 July 2010.

Abstract 

Study Objective

To compare feasibility and surgical outcome of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery between obese, overweight, normal-weight, and underweight women.

Design

Retrospective case control study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).

Setting

Surgery Unit of Minimally Invasive Gynaecology.

Patients

A total of 503 women who underwent laparoscopic procedures for both benign disease and malignancies.

Interventions

Four main categories of gynecologic disease were identified: uterine fibroids, benign adnexal masses, endometriosis, and endometrial cancer (stage I). For each category patients were divided into 4 groups: underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2), normal-weight (BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2).

Measurements and Main Results

Selected outcomes were duration of surgery, rate of laparotomy conversion, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and duration of hospital stay. No statistical difference regarding demographic data, surgical and medical history, and intraoperative findings was present between groups. No laparotomy conversion occurred. Regarding duration of surgery, we found no statistical difference among the BMI groups with regard to benign diseases, whereas pelvic lymphadenectomy in obese patients with endometrial cancer had a statistically significant longer duration than in the control group (122 ± 47min vs 65 ± 21 min, p <.001). The postoperative complication rate was 0.01%: 3 cases of blood transfusion and 1 case of hemoperitoneum among myomectomies; 1 ureteral fistula in surgery for pelvic endometriosis; and 1 case of postoperative lymphocele in endometrial cancer group. No statistically significant difference was found in duration of hospital stay among the BMI groups in any of the categories of disease. For each category we conducted an analysis to identify any possible risk factors other than BMI in the surgical outcomes.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic approach in the various applications of gynecologic surgery does not appear to be significantly influenced by BMI in terms of surgical outcomes, laparotomy conversion rate, intraoperative and postoperative complications rate, and duration of hospital stay. The technical difficulties can be solved if skilled surgeons and anesthetists are available.

Keywords: Laparoscopy, BMI, Obesity, Gynecology

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1553-4650(10)00141-X

doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.04.002

The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 17, Issue 5 , Pages 576-582, September 2010