The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 17, Issue 5 , Pages 605-611, September 2010

Human Amnion as a Temporary Biologic Barrier after Hysteroscopic Lysis of Severe Intrauterine Adhesions: Pilot Study

  • Mohamed I. Amer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Amer, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ain Shams University, 169 Gisr El Suiz St, Bldg 5, Apt 51, Helliopolis, Cairo 11351 Egypt.
  • ,
  • Karim H.I. Abd-El-Maeboud, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  • ,
  • Ihab Abdelfatah, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  • ,
  • Fekrya Ahmad Salama, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  • ,
  • Al Said Abdallah, MB BCH

      Affiliations

    • Al Ismailia General Hospital, Ismailia, Egypt

Received 7 January 2010; accepted 15 March 2010. published online 24 June 2010.

Abstract 

Study Objective

To estimate the efficacy of fresh and dried amnion graft after hysteroscopic lysis of severe intrauterine adhesions in decreasing its recurrence and encouraging endometrial regeneration.

Design

Pilot prospective randomized comparative study (Canadian Task Force classification I).

Setting

Ain Shams Medical School, Cairo, Egypt.

Patients

Forty-five patients with severe intrauterine adhesions. Primary symptom was infertility with or without menstrual disorders such as amenorrhea or hypomenorrhea.

Interventions

Patients were randomized preoperatively using a computer-generated randomization sheet into 3 groups of 15 patients each. Allocation to any group was concealed in an opaque envelope, which was opened at the time of operation. Hysteroscopic lysis of intrauterine adhesions was followed by insertion of an intrauterine balloon only (group 1) or either fresh amnion graft (group 2) or dried amnion graft (group 3) for 2 weeks. Diagnostic hysteroscopy was performed at 2 to 4 months postoperatively.

Measurements and Main Results

Adhesion grade, menstruation, uterine length, complications, and reproductive outcome were determined. There was significant improvement in adhesion grade with amnion graft vs intrauterine balloon alone (p = .003). Improvement was greater with fresh amnion than with dried amnion (p = .01). Normal menstruation occurred in 4 patients (28.6%) in group 1, 5 (35.7%) in group 2, and 7 (46.7%) in group 3. Of 43 patients, 41 (95.3%) were treated in 2 endoscopic sessions (95.3%), and 2 patients (4.7%) were treated in 3 endoscopic sessions. Uterine perforations occurred in 2 patients (4.7%), and cervical tears in 3 (7.0%). Ten patients (23.3%) achieved pregnancy, 8 (80%) after amnion graft and 2 (20%) without amnion. Six of the 10 patients (60%) miscarried, and 4 (40%) were either still pregnant or delivered at term without complications.

Conclusion

Hysteroscopic lysis of severe intrauterine adhesions with grafting of either fresh or dried amnion is a promising adjunctive procedure for decreasing recurrence of adhesions and encouraging endometrial regeneration.

Keywords: Amnion graft, Hysteroscopy, Intrauterine adhesions, Intrauterine balloon, Reproductive outcome

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

PII: S1553-4650(10)00132-9

doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.019

The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 17, Issue 5 , Pages 605-611, September 2010