Journal Home
Search for

Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 421-435 (July 2010)


View previous. 12 of 32 View next.

Past, Present, and Future of Hysterectomy

Chris Sutton, MA, MB, BChir, FRCOGCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 4 December 2009; accepted 7 March 2010.

Abstract 

Until the late 1930s, the standard type of abdominal hysterectomy was subtotal, leaving the cervix behind to decrease the risk of peritonitis with its attendant high mortality. With the discovery of antibiotics, careful attention to antisepsis, and other medical and surgical advances, this method was gradually replaced by total abdominal hysterectomy in the United States and the United Kingdom, although the subtotal approach still remained popular, in particular in Scandinavian countries. With the advent of laparoscopic hysterectomy, many surgeons, wanting a simpler approach and for a variety of other reasons, have returned to performance of subtotal hysterectomy. The objectives of the present article is to review the development of the operation from a historical perspective, and to attempt to answer some of the dilemmas posed when choosing between a total and subtotal procedure, using results from evidence-based research when possible.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Surrey Postgraduate Medical School, and the Department of Gynaecological Surgery, BMI-Mount Alvernia Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, England

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Prof. C.J.G Sutton, BMI-Mount Alvernia Hospital, Harvey Road, Guildford, Surrey GU1 3LX, England.

 The author has no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

PII: S1553-4650(10)00117-2

doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.005


View previous. 12 of 32 View next.