The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 17, Issue 3 , Pages 301-305, May 2010

Strategy for Laparoscopic Cervical Myomectomy

  • Shozo Matsuoka, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Shozo Matsuoka, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Hongo, 2-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421.
  • ,
  • Iwaho Kikuchi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Mari Kitade, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Jun Kumakiri, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Keiji Kuroda, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Sachiko Tokita, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Masako Kuroda, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Satoru Takeda, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Received 15 October 2009; accepted 23 December 2009. published online 22 March 2010.

Abstract 

Objective

Myoma of the uterine cervix is rare, accounting for about 5% of all myomas. Compared with myomas that occur in the uterine corpus, cervical myomas are closer to other organs such as the bladder, ureter, and rectum, and the approach needs to be modified because the organs that have to be considered differ depending on the location of the myoma. We divided cervical myomas into 2 types according to location, comprising an intracervical type and extracervical types. A clear outline of surgical treatment for cervical myoma has not described in previous papers. We then investigated the surgical strategy for these types.

Patients

Subjects comprised 16 patients who were diagnosed with cervical myoma in our hospital between January 2005 and April 2009, and who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy.

Result

Mean operative time was 105.8±43.2 (82.8-128.8) min, mean blood loss was 105±117 (42.6-167.4) ml, and mean specimen weight was 208.3±195.4 (99.3-306.2) g. Histopathological examination showed atypical myoma in 1 case and leiomyoma in others.

Conclusions

16 cases of cervical myomectomy were performed safely by developing a uniform strategy that uses a fixed operative procedure, even with laparotomy, if sufficient attention is paid to the following 6 points: 1) attempting to reduce the size of the myoma with the use of preoperative GnRH; 2) determining the positional relationship between the myoma and surrounding organs; 3) temporarily blocking uterine artery blood flow with the use of vessel clips; 4) suppressing bleeding during myomectomy with the use of vasopressin; 5) minimizing the risk of damaging surrounding organs by positioning the incision in the myometrium somewhat lateral to the uterine corpus; and 6) the bottom of the wound after enculation should be pulled up by the forceps for suturing to avoid making dead space.

Keywords: Laparoscopy, Cervical myoma, Myomectomy, Uterine artery

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

PII: S1553-4650(09)01349-1

doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2009.12.020

The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 17, Issue 3 , Pages 301-305, May 2010