The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 154-160, March 2010

Vaginal Myomectomy: Literature Review

  • Erika Faivre, MD

      Affiliations

    • Université Paris–SUD and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Antoione-Béclère, Clamart, France
  • ,
  • Michèle Morin Surroca, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Professional Procedure Evaluation, French National Authority for Health, Saint-Denis La Plaine Cedex, France
  • ,
  • Xavier Deffieux, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Université Paris–SUD and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Antoione-Béclère, Clamart, France
  • ,
  • Frédérique Pages

      Affiliations

    • Department of Professional Procedure Evaluation, French National Authority for Health, Saint-Denis La Plaine Cedex, France
  • ,
  • Amélie Gervaise, MD

      Affiliations

    • Université Paris–SUD, Bicêtre and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Bicêtre, Kremlin, France
  • ,
  • Hervé Fernandez, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Université Paris–SUD, Bicêtre and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Bicêtre, Kremlin, France
    • INSERM U 822, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Hervé Fernandez, MD, PhD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Bicêtre, 78 Rue du General Leclerce, Le Kremlin Bicêtre 94270, France.

Received 15 September 2009; accepted 15 December 2009.

Abstract 

The objective of this literature review was to evaluate the results obtained at vaginal myomectomy. The databases consulted were Medline, Cochrane Library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, and Health Technology Assessment Database. Keywords used for research were colpotomy, myomectomy, and vaginal myomectomy, and then abdominal myomectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal myomectomy, and laparoscopic myomectomy. Eight case series and 2 case reports were analyzed, and included 372 patients. Reported rates of conversion to laparotomy during the operation ranged from 0% to 17.6%. The most frequently described risk factors for conversion to laparotomy were location of the myoma in the fundus and a large volume of myoma to be extracted, although no maximum threshold size can be defined. Performing laparoscopy first does not seem to limit the risk. Reported rates of transfusion during the operation ranged from 0% to 40%. Several cases of pelvic abscess have been described, with reported frequency of 2.2% to 5.7%. Authors mentioned the role of the vaginal drain that is inserted at the end of the procedure. No specific studies have been performed on long-term effectiveness, postoperative adhesions, integrity of the scar, or subsequent fertility. There are no good controlled studies of this technique. Feasibility seems to be acceptable, although the risk of pelvic infection in the postoperative period may be increased. Long-term effectiveness and safety were not assessed. A vaginal approach may be considered an alternative to laparotomy or laparoscopy in surgery to treat accessible myomas, and seems to be the simplest method.

Keywords: Colpotomy, Myomectomy, Vaginal myomectomy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

 This study was supported by a grant from HAS (Haute Autorité de Santé), Paris, France, to define the professional procedure evaluation.

PII: S1553-4650(09)01316-8

doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2009.12.007

The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 154-160, March 2010