The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 186-191, March 2010

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the Presence of Previous Caesarean Section: A Review of One Hundred Forty-One Cases in the Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery Unit

  • L. Wang, MRANZCOG

      Affiliations

    • Gynaecology Endoscopy Unit, Blacktown Hospital, the Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery Unit, Sydney West Area Health Service, Sydney, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Luice Wang, Gynaecology Endoscopy Fellow, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown Road, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia.
  • ,
  • H. Merkur, FRANZCOG

      Affiliations

    • Gynaecology Endoscopy Unit, Blacktown Hospital, the Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery Unit, Sydney West Area Health Service, Sydney, Australia
  • ,
  • G. Hardas, FRANZCOG

      Affiliations

    • Gynaecology Endoscopy Unit, Blacktown Hospital, the Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery Unit, Sydney West Area Health Service, Sydney, Australia
  • ,
  • S. Soo, FRANZCOG

      Affiliations

    • Gynaecology Endoscopy Unit, Blacktown Hospital, the Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery Unit, Sydney West Area Health Service, Sydney, Australia
  • ,
  • S. Lujic, MBiostat

      Affiliations

    • School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown Campus, Sydney, Australia

Received 17 June 2009; accepted 4 November 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

To examine whether laparoscopic hysterectomy is safe in the presence of previous caesarean section (CS).

Design

Canadian Task Force Classification II-2.

Setting

Laparoscopic hysterectomies performed for nonmalignant conditions by 7 gynecologic surgeons in public and private hospitals in Western Sydney.

Patients

Data were collected from January 2001 through December 2007, involving 574 patients, of which 141 patients had 1 or more previous CS.

Intervention

Laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Measurements

Conversions to laparotomy and major intraoperative and postoperative complications (within 6 weeks of surgery) were recorded and compared between cohorts of patients with and without previous caesarean sections.

Main Results

Of the 574 laparoscopic hysterectomies identified, 141 (24.6%) patients had at least 1 previous CS. Most women with previous CS had only 1 CS (51.8%), whereas 13.5% had 3 or more CS. The overall major complication rate among patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy was 10.1%. The most common complication was hemorrhage (7.3% of patients) and inadvertent cystotomy (2.1%). The rate of major complications varied between the CS and non-CS groups. Among the non-CS group, the complication rate was 8.8%, whereas the complication rate among the CS group was 14.2%. The rate of inadvertent cystotomy in the group with no previous CS was 5 in 433 patients (1.2%). The rate of bladder complications showed an increase with the number of previous CS: 2.5% of patients with 1 or 2 previous CS and 21.1% of patients with 3 or more previous CS. The rate of inadvertent cystotomy in patients with 3 or more CS was 18 times that of patients with no CS (95% CI 5.1, 66.0). Twenty-four (5.5%) patients without previous CS and 15 (10.6%) patients with previous CS required conversion to laparotomy because of dense bladder or bowel adhesions.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic hysterectomy in the setting of previous CS is recommended because long-term sequelae are rare. There are higher rates of major complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy with previous CS; the higher the number of previous CS, the higher the rate of complications. The most significant increase is seen in patients with more than 2 previous CS.

Keywords: Laparoscopy, Hysterectomy, Laparoscopic hysterectomy, Caesarean section

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

PII: S1553-4650(09)01248-5

doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2009.11.007

The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 186-191, March 2010