The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 17, Issue 1 , Pages 16-20, January 2010

A Comparative, Single-Blind, Randomized Trial of Pain Associated with Suction or Non-Suction Drains after Gynecologic Laparoscopy

University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Received 4 February 2009; accepted 16 April 2009. published online 01 June 2009.

Abstract 

Study Objective

To estimate the difference in pain associated with the wearing or removal of suction or non-suction drains after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

Design

A randomized controlled trial from August 2006 through October 2007 (Canadian Task Force Classification I).

Setting

Royal Hospital for Women, Department of Endo-Gynaecology and School of Women's and Children's Health University of New South Wales.

Patients

A total of 168 women undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy requiring postoperative drainage.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to receive either a suction or non-suction drain after surgery.

Measurements and Main Results

Pain was assessed before, during, and after drain removal with a 4-point verbal descriptor scale and 10-cm visual analogue scale. Visual analogue scale and verbal descriptor scale scores for suction versus non-suction groups were 3 versus 3 (p=.654) and 1 versus 1 (p=.686) before removal, 9 versus 7 (p=.016) and 3 versus 2 (p=.029) during removal, and 7 versus 5 (p=.058) and 2 versus 2 (p=.122) after removal.

Conclusion

There is no significant difference in patient discomfort while wearing or after removal of suction or non-suction drains. However, suction drains are more painful to have removed.

Keywords: Drainage, Gynecologic laparoscopy, Non-suction drain, Pain, Suction drain

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

 Presented at the 37th Meeting of the AAGL, October 28–November 1, 2008 Las Vegas Nevada.

PII: S1553-4650(09)00230-1

doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2009.04.010

The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 17, Issue 1 , Pages 16-20, January 2010