Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 181-187, March 2009
Hysteroscopy in Women with Implantation Failures after In Vitro Fertilization: Findings and Effect on Subsequent Pregnancy Rates
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate hysteroscopic findings and estimate the effect of hysteroscopy on achieving a pregnancy in women with a history of 2 implantation failures after in vitro fertilization (IVF).
Design
Prospective observational and matched case control study. Design classification: II-2.
Setting
Private assisted reproduction units.
Patients
A total of 1475 patients with a history of 2 consecutive implantation failures after IVF who had a hysteroscopy were studied; there were 414 matched pairs of women with a similar history who either had or did not have a hysteroscopy.
Interventions
Hysteroscopy (diagnostic or operative), IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle.
Measurements and Main Results
Hysteroscopic findings, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) were measured. In all, 36.6% of the study population had abnormal hysteroscopic findings and 22.2% had unsuspected findings; women with abnormal hysteroscopic findings showed significantly increased CPR and increased OPR in a new IVF cycle compared with those with a normal hysteroscopy result. Women who had a hysteroscopy showed significantly increased CPR and OPR compared with matched control subjects who did not have the procedure. Hysteroscopy and appropriate therapy significantly increased the chances of achieving a subsequent clinical and ongoing pregnancy.
Conclusion
Women with 2 implantation failures after IVF had a remarkably high possibility for unsuspected abnormalities seen at hysteroscopy. Hysteroscopy could serve as a positive prognostic factor for achieving a subsequent pregnancy.
Keywords: Hysteroscopy, In vitro fertilization, Implantation failure, Clinical pregnancy
To access this article, please choose from the options below
The authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.
PII: S1553-4650(08)01218-1
doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2008.12.016
© 2009 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 181-187, March 2009
