Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 40-46, January 2009
Rate, Type, and Cost of Invasive Interventions for Uterine Myomas in Germany, France, and England
Abstract
Study Objective
The objective of our study was to quantify the rate, type, and cost of interventions for uterine myomas to payers in Germany, France, and England.
Design
Computations using data from national hospital activity databases. Design classification: II-3.
Setting
Hospital admissions in Germany, France, and England.
Patients
Women admitted for a surgical or radiologic intervention for uterine myomas.
Interventions
Surgical or radiologic interventions for uterine myomas.
Measurements and Main Results
We identified the number and type of hospital admissions involving surgical or radiologic interventions for uterine myomas, through the analysis of national hospital activity databases from each country. We calculated the costs of these hospitalizations to payers in these countries using the diagnosis-related group reimbursement rates. In 2005, the number (rate) of hospital admissions involving interventions for uterine myomas was 64 299 (1.53/1000 women) in Germany, 37 787 (1.17/1000 women) in France, and 18 274 (0.71/1000 women) in England. The annual costs of these interventions to payers were €212 313 090 in Germany, €73 278 270 in France (excluding surgeon and anesthetist fees for interventions in the private sector), and €52 674 672 in England. The percentage of interventions for uterine myomas that included a hysterectomy was 84.9% in Germany, 59.7% in France, and 64.1% in England.
Conclusion
The number of admissions and costs associated with interventions for uterine myomas are substantial in the 3 European countries studied. Hysterectomy is the most frequent surgical intervention used to treat uterine myomas. The results in this article provide useful information for policy makers wishing to evaluate the cost effectiveness and budget impact of new, less invasive interventions.
Keywords: Myoma, Cost, Europe, Fibroids, Burden, Treatment pattern
Funding for this study was provided by Ethicon. Drs. Fernandez and Farrugia act as paid consultants for Ethicon Women's Health and Urology. Drs. Jones and Oppelt are investigators in the Doppler-guided Uterine Artery Occlusion Study sponsored by Ethicon. They hold no stock in the company and have no financial interest in any of the company's products. Dr. Mauskopf has acted as a paid consultant for Johnson & Johnson and for many other pharmaceutical and medical device companies. She worked with Ethicon under a contract to prepare this manuscript. She holds no stock in any of the companies and has no financial interest in their products. Dr. Subramanian currently is an employee of Ethicon.
PII: S1553-4650(08)00977-1
doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2008.09.581
© 2008 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 40-46, January 2009
