The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 254-255 , March 2008

Puntambekar et al. Laparoscopic Total Radical Hysterectomy by the Pune Technique: Our Experience of 248 Cases

References 

  1. Puntambekar SP, Palep RJ, Puntambekar SS, Wagh GN, Patil AM, Rayate NV, et al. Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:682–689
  2. Lopes AD, Hall JR, Monaghan JM. Drainage following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: dogma or need?. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:960–963
  3. Srisomboon J, Phongnarisorn C, Suprasert P, Cheewakriangkrai C, Siriaree S, Charoenkwan K. A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2002;28:149–153
  4. Franchi M, Trimbos JB, Zanaboni Fvd, Velden J, Reed N, Coens C, et al. Randomized trial of drains versus no drains following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG) study in 234 patients. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1265–1268

PII: S1553-4650(07)01212-5

doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.12.003

The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 254-255 , March 2008

Article Tools