The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 248-253 , March 2008

Videoregistration of Surgery Should be Used as a Quality Control

  • Philippe R. Koninckx, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Philippe R. Koninckx, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.

Received 4 July 2007 ,Accepted 4 December 2007.

References 

  1. Doyen EL. Le cinématographe et l’Enseignement de la chirurgie. Les Nouvelles Scientifiques et Photographiques. 1899;8:100–140
  2. Setubal A. Cinema to teach surgery. 2007;Annual meeting in endoscopic surgery, Lisbon.
  3. Setubal A. Cinema to teach surgery. 2007;Presented at the SEGI/AAGL joint meeting, Palermo, Italy
  4. Hartford CG, Petchel KS, Mickail H, Perez-Gutthann S, McHale M, Grana JM, et al. Pharmacovigilance during the pre-approval phases: an evolving pharmaceutical industry model in response to ICH E2E, CIOMS VI, FDA and EMEA/CHMP risk-management guidelines. Drug Saf. 2006;29:657–673
  5. Laenge R, Steger-Hartmann T, Schweinfurth H. The environmental risk assessment of human pharmaceuticals in the overall EU regulatory affairs process. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006;45:223–228
  6. Singh SS. Preclinical pharmacokinetics: an approach towards safer and efficacious drugs. Curr Drug Metab. 2006;7:165–182
  7. Bahri P, Tsintis P. Pharmacovigilance-related topics at the level of the international conference on harmonization (ICH). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14:377–387
  8. Papanicolaou S, Sykes D, Mossialos E. EMEA and the evaluation of health-related quality of life data in the drug regulatory process. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:311–324
  9. Pignatti F, Boone H, Moulon I. Overview of the European regulatory approval system. J Ambul Care Manage. 2004;27:89–97
  10. Pineiro-Carrero VM, Pineiro EO. Liver. Pediatrics. 2004;113:1097–1106
  11. Atuah KN, Hughes D, Pirmohamed M. Clinical pharmacology: special safety considerations in drug development and pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2004;27:535–554
  12. Gough S. Post-marketing surveillance: a UK/European perspective. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21:565–570
  13. Haas JF. A problem-oriented approach to safety issues in drug development and beyond. Drug Saf. 2004;27:555–567
  14. Hanzl-Dujmovic I, Sulic-Milisic Z, Staresinic-Sernhorst I. Issues with regulatory pharmacovigilance in East European countries: the industry perspective. Toxicol Lett. 2007;168:228–235
  15. Graul AI. Promoting, improving and accelerating the drug development and approval process. Drug News Perspect. 2007;20:45–55
  16. Hauben M, Madigan D, Gerrits CM, Walsh L, Van Puijenbroek EP. The role of data mining in pharmacovigilance. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2005;4:929–948
  17. Klepper MJ. The periodic safety update report as a pharmacovigilance tool. Drug Saf. 2004;27:569–578
  18. Lindquist M. Data quality management in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2004;27:857–870
  19. Montastruc JL, Sommet A, Lacroix I, Olivier P, Durrieu G, Damase-Michel C, et al. Pharmacovigilance for evaluating adverse drug reactions: value, organization, and methods. Joint Bone Spine. 2006;73:629–632
  20. van Grootheest K, de Graaf L, de Jong-van den Berg LT. Consumer adverse drug reaction reporting: a new step in pharmacovigilance?. Drug Saf. 2003;26:211–217
  21. Wilson AM, Thabane L, Holbrook A. Application of data mining techniques in pharmacovigilance. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;57:127–134
  22. Wood L, Martinez C. The general practice research database: role in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2004;27:871–881
  23. Yunis AA. Chloramphenicol toxicity: 25 years of research. Am J Med. 1989;87:44N–48N
  24. Holt D, Harvey D, Hurley R. Chloramphenicol toxicity. Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev. 1993;12:83–95
  25. McDonough PG. The randomized world is not without its imperfections: reflections on the women’s health initiative study. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:951–956
  26. Machens K, Schmidt-Gollwitzer K. Issues to debate on the women’s health initiative (WHI) study (Hormone replacement therapy: an epidemiological dilemma?). Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1992–1999
  27. Garbe E, Suissa S. Hormone replacement therapy and acute coronary outcomes: methodological issues between randomized and observational studies. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:8–13
  28. Antoine C, Liebens F, Carly B, Pastijn A, Rozenberg S. Influence of HRT on prognostic factors for breast cancer: a systematic review after the women’s health initiative trial. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:741–756
  29. Mastorakos G, Sakkas EG, Xydakis AM, Creatsas G. Pitfalls of the WHIs: women’s health initiative. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1092:331–340
  30. Sergeant PT, Blackstone EH. Closing the loop: optimizing physicians’ operational and strategic behavior. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:362–366
  31. Molinas CR, Binda MM, Mailova K, Koninckx PR. The rabbit nephrectomy model for training in laparoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:185–190
  32. Edwards IR. The management of adverse drug reactions: from diagnosis to signal. Therapie. 2001;56:727–733
  33. Pillinger SH, Monson JR. Laparoscopy for rectal carcinoma: anterior resection. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2004;11:13–17
  34. Bollens R, Sandhu S, Roumeguere T, Quackels T, Schulman C. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the learning curve. Curr Opin Urol. 2005;15:79–82
  35. Renzulli P, Laffer UT. Learning curve: the surgeon as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer surgery. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2005;165:86–104
  36. Kumar U, Gill IS. Learning curve in human laparoscopic surgery. Curr Urol Rep. 2006;7:120–124
  37. Paraiso MF. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;18:385–390
  38. Agachan F, Joe JS, Sher M, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do we get faster?. Surg Endosc Ultrasound Intervent Techniques. 1997;11:331–335
  39. Atlas I, Sert MB, Childers JM. Preliminary technique of laparoscopic extraperitoneal infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in the porcine model. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1998;5:283–287
  40. Chaudhry A, Sutton C, Wood J, Stone R, McCloy R. Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999;81:281–286
  41. Dunphy BC, Shepherd S, Cooke ID. Impact of the learning curve on term delivery rates following laparoscopic salpingostomy for infertility associated with distal tubal occlusive disease. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1181–1183
  42. Eubanks TR, Clements RH, Pohl D, Williams N, Schaad DC, Horgan S, et al. An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:566–574
  43. Gates EA. New surgical procedures: can our patients benefit while we learn?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:1293–1298
  44. Macmillan AIM, Cuschieri A. Assessment of innate ability and skills for endoscopic manipulations by the advanced Dundee endoscopic psychomotor tester: predictive and concurrent validity. Am J Surg. 1999;177:274–277
  45. Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, Castelli A, Cittadini E. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2996–2999
  46. Rege RV, Joehl RJ. A learning curve for laparoscopic splenectomy at an academic institution. J Surg Res. 1999;81:27–32
  47. Vossen C, Van Ballaer P, Shaw RW, Koninckx PR. Effect of training on endoscopic intracorporeal knot tying. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2658–2663
  48. Fernandez AZ, DeMaria EJ, Tichansky DS, Kellum JM, Wolfe LG, Meador J, et al. Experience with over 3,000 open and laparoscopic bariatric procedures: multivariate analysis of factors related to leak and resultant mortality. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:193–197
  49. Koninckx PR. Biases in the endometriosis literature–illustrated by 20 years of endometriosis research in Leuven. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;81:259–271
  50. Canis M, Pouly JL, Tamburro S, Mage G, Wattiez A, Bruhat MA. Ovarian response during IVF-embryo transfer cycles after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy for endometriotic cysts of >3 cm in diameter. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2583–2586
  51. Koninckx PR, Martin D. Treatment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;6:231–241
  52. De Cicco C, Ret Davalos ML, Van Cleunebreughel H, Koninckx PR. Ureter lesions and repair: a review for gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:428–435
  53. Ret Davalos ML, De Cicco C, D’Hoore A, De Decker B, Koninckx PR. Outcome after rectum or sigmoid resection: a review for gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:33–38
  54. Morris RJT, Truskowski BJ. The evolution of storage systems. IBM Systems J. 2003;42:206–217
  55. Keyes RW. The impact of Moore’s Law. 2007;IEEE Soc Solid-State Circuits Newsletter

 The author has no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

 Available at www.sciencedirect.com and www.jmig.org

PII: S1553-4650(07)01210-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.12.001

The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 248-253 , March 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution