The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 241-247, March 2008

Embolism of Air and Gas in Hysteroscopic Procedures: Pathophysiology and Implication for Daily Practice

  • Frederick A. Groenman, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Louisette W. Peters, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Bart M.P. Rademaker, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Erica A. Bakkum, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: E. A. Bakkum, MD, PhD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Oosterpark 9, 1091 AC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Received 18 June 2007; accepted 29 October 2007.

Abstract 

Hysteroscopic surgery has gained in popularity and has become the method of choice for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions of intrauterine pathology. Advantages consist of short operating time, rapid postoperative recovery, and low morbidity. However, there are concerns about the potential serious complications that can occur, such as venous air and gas embolism. These are rare but hazardous complications, which can occur in all surgical procedures. In hysteroscopic surgery, large uterine veins may be exposed and are, therefore, a point of entry for gas or air. A number of fatal and nonfatal cases have been described as case reports. Although awareness for air and gas embolism is raised this way, proper guidelines as to how to reduce the risk of venous gas or air embolism are lacking. The pathophysiologic difference between gas and air embolism is described herein because composition of the gases differs as does their physiologic effects. A gas embolism is likely to be derived from electrosurgical vapors whereas air embolism seems to arise from improper purging of lines or reinsertion of hysteroscopic instruments. Treatment regimens must, therefore, be designed to address the specific gases involved. Signs and symptoms of these different embolisms are described, as early detection and intervention are crucial for survival. Furthermore, we provide guidelines for operating department personnel, surgeons, and anesthesiologists to reduce the risk of venous gas or air embolism during hysteroscopic procedures. Potential complications of these procedures may be prevented this way.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

 Available at www.sciencedirect.com and www.jmig.org

PII: S1553-4650(07)01200-9

doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2007.10.010

The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 241-247, March 2008