Journal Home
Search for

Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 508-513 (December 2005)


View previous. 19 of 34 View next.

Surgical treatment of deep endometriosis and risk of recurrence

Michele Vignali, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Stefano Bianchi, MDb, Massimo Candiani, MDb, Giovanna Spadaccini, MDa, Giulia Oggioni, MDa, Mauro Busacca, MDa

Received 23 November 2004; accepted 15 June 2005.

Abstract 

Study objective

To evaluate the risk of recurrence of deep endometriosis after conservative surgery.

Design

Retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).

Setting

Tertiary care university hospital.

Patients

One hundred fifteen symptomatic patients operated on in our department from 1996 through 2002 with postoperative follow-up of at least 12 months.

Intervention

All patients underwent conservative surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis.

Measurement and main results

Risk factors for recurrence of symptoms and clinical findings and for repeated surgery were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. During follow-up, we observed 28 patients with pain recurrence and 15 patients with recurrent clinical findings, and 12 patients required reoperation for deep endometriosis. Recurrence rates of pain and clinical findings during 36 months were 20.5% and 9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that only age was a significant predictor of pain recurrence (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.81-0.99, p <.05), enhancing the risk in younger patients. Recurrence of clinical signs of deep endometriosis was predicted by obliteration of the pouch of Douglas (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.16-16.2, p <.05). Reoperation for deep endometriosis was predicted only by the incompleteness of first operation (OR 21.9, 95% CI 3.2–146.5, p <.001).

Conclusion

Our study indicates that age, obliteration of the pouch of Douglas, and surgical completeness may have a significant influence on the recurrence of the disease.

a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Milano, Macedonio Melloni Hospital, Milano, Italy.

b Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Milano, Clinica Mangiagalli, Milano, Italy.

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Michele Vignali, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Milano, Via Macedonio Melloni, 52, 20122 Milano, Italy.

PII: S1553-4650(05)00899-X

doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2005.06.016


View previous. 19 of 34 View next.